CourtListener 10152230•State v. Andre Deshawn Posey
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Andre Deshawn Posey, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001997
Appeal From Richland County
Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-130
Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 23, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.