CourtListener 10152134•State v. Williams
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jamel Dajour Williams, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000101
Appeal From Allendale County
Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-017
Submitted November 1, 2021 – Filed January 12, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia,
and Jamel Dajour Williams, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se briefs and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
WILLIAMS, A.C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.