State v. Foster

CourtListener 10152116Scctapp08.12.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Heirberone Heava Foster, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000892

Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-433
Submitted October 1, 2021 – Filed December 8, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, and Heirberone Heava Foster, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se briefs and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.