State v. Dorko

CourtListener 10152086Scctapp03.11.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Mark Jeffrey Dorko, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000239

Appeal From York County
Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-389
Submitted October 1, 2021 – Filed November 3, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation,
Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.