State v. Cummings

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tristian Cummings, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000665

Appeal From Greenville County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-266
Submitted June 1, 2021 – Filed July 14, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Tristian Cummings, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.