State v. Davis

CourtListener 10151910Scctapp09.06.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carnell Davis, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001976

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Grace Gilchrist Knie, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-210
Submitted May 1, 2021 – Filed June 9, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.