CourtListener 10151774•Antonio D. Young
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Antonio D.
Young, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000823
Appeal From Charleston County
R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-068
Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed March 10, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and
Antonio D. Young, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.