CourtListener 10151740•SCDSS v. Marks
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Abagail Hope Marks and Nathan Terrance Lang,
Defendants,
Of whom Nathan Terrance Lang is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001482
Appeal From Laurens County
Joseph C. Smithdeal, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-106
Submitted March 29, 2021 – Filed March 30, 2021
AFFIRMED
Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.
Rosemerry Felder-Commander, of South Carolina
Department of Social Services, of Laurens, for
Respondent.
Marcus Wesley Meetze, of Law Office of Marcus W.
Meetze, LLC, of Simpsonville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Nathan Terrance Lang appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Lang's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.