State v. Holcomb

CourtListener 10151717Scctapp10.02.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dean Alton Holcomb, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001659

Appeal From Greenville County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-039
Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed February 10, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia; and Dean Alton Holcomb, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General William Frederick Schumacher, IV,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.