Dylan L. M.

CourtListener 10151709Scctapp24.02.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Dylan L. M., A Juvenile Under the Age
of Seventeen, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-000619

Appeal From Pickens County
Karen S. Roper, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-052
Submitted February 1, 2021 – Filed February 24, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.