In the Interest of Matthew K.

CourtListener 10151382Scctapp08.04.2020

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Matthew K., a Juvenile under the age of
Seventeen, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001002

Appeal From Pickens County
Tarita A. Dunbar, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-094
Submitted February 1, 2020 – Filed April 8, 2020

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.