CourtListener 10151377•State v. Brooks
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
James Michael Brooks, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-002075
Appeal From Berkeley County
J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-098
Submitted March 1, 2020 – Filed April 8, 2020
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.