SCDSS v. McKenzie

CourtListener 10151261Scctapp03.12.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Donald McKenzie, Nancy McKenzie, and John Doe,
Defendants,

Of whom Nancy McKenzie is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001083

Appeal From Sumter County
Thomas M. Bultman, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-374
Submitted November 15, 2019 – Filed December 3, 2019

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Steve Bernard Suchomski, of Sumter, for Respondent.
Edgar R. Donnald, Jr., of Sumter, for the Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Nancy McKenzie appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McKenzie's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.