State v. Goodrich

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joseph Goodrich, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000725

Appeal From Dorchester County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-395
Submitted November 1, 2019 – Filed December 18, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.