CourtListener 10151190•SCDSS v. Chambers
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Hayline Chambers and Anthony Hoey, Defendants,
Of whom Hayline Chambers is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2018-002001
Appeal From Cherokee County
Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-322
Submitted September 11, 2019 – Filed October 1, 2019
AFFIRMED
Amanda Mange Scott, of Parnell & Parnell, P.A., of
White Rock, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Hayline Chambers appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Chambers's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.