CourtListener 10151017•State v. Cook
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Nelson Sentelle Cook, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2018-000578
Appeal From York County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-168
Submitted April 1, 2019 – Filed May 8, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.