State v. Rathburn

CourtListener 10150983Scctapp10.04.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Pepper Rose Rathburn, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002560

Appeal From Florence County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-129
Submitted March 1, 2019 – Filed April 10, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Matthew C.
Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.