State v. Byars

CourtListener 10150976Scctapp17.04.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher Antoine Byars, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001722

Appeal From Bamberg County
L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-142
Submitted March 1, 2019 – Filed April 17, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defenders Laura Ruth Baer and Joanna
Katherine Delany, both of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.