SCDSS v. Inabinett

CourtListener 10150949Scctapp25.03.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Tenetia Inabinett and Edward Alexander, III, Defendants,

Of whom Tenetia Inabinett is the Appellant,

and

Edward Alexander, III, is a Respondent.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001045

Appeal From Lexington County
Dorothy Mobley Jones, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-122
Submitted March 7, 2019 – Filed March 25, 2019

AFFIRMED

Lyn Howell Hensel, of Law Office of Lyn Howell
Hensel, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Tenetia Inabinett appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Inabinett's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.