Torrence v. SCDC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Thomas J. Torrence, Respondent,

v.

South Carolina Department of Corrections, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000285

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court
Deborah Brooks Durden, Administrative Law Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-432
Submitted May 1, 2018 – Filed November 28, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Lake E. Summers, of Malone, Thompson, Summers &
Ott, LLC, of Columbia, Appellant.

Thomas J. Torrence, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Appeal dismissed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authorities: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth. v. S.C. Dep't of Health
and Envt'l Control, 387 S.C. 265, 267, 692 S.E.2d 894, 894 (2010) ("The order of
the ALC in this case is not a final order. If there is some further act which must be
done by the court prior to a determination of the rights of the parties, the order is
interlocutory" and not immediately appealable.); S.C. Code Ann. § 1–23–
610(A)(1) (Supp. 2018) (providing for judicial review by this court of "a final
decision" of the ALC).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.