CourtListener 10150751•In the Matter of Wake Hunt
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Wake Hunt,
Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2017-000585
Appeal From Orangeburg County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-398
Submitted October 1, 2018 – Filed October 31, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's
motion to be relieved is granted.1
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.