Addy v. Mock

CourtListener 10150742Scctapp06.09.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Kara S. Addy and Michael A. Addy, Respondents,

v.

Richard B. Mock, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002352

Appeal From Richland County
Michelle M. Hurley, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-366
Submitted August 27, 2018 – Filed September 6, 2018

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.

Carrie Ann Warner, of Carrie A. Warner, Attorney at
Law, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondents.

April Lawhon Gremillion, of Columbia, for the Guardian
ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Richard B. Mock, Jr., appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Mock's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.