SCDSS v. Badger

CourtListener 10150717Scctapp24.08.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Carrie Badger and Jonathan Crane, Defendants,

Of whom Carrie Badger is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002074

Appeal From Aiken County
Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-361
Submitted August 22, 2018 – Filed August 24, 2018

AFFIRMED

Montford Shuler Caughman, of Caughman Law, LLC, of
Lexington, for Appellant.

Susanna M. Ringler, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Aiken, for Respondent.
Amy Patterson Shumpert, of Nance, McCants & Massey,
of Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Carrie Badger appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Badger's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.