State v. Tucker

CourtListener 10150701Scctapp05.07.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kendra Nicole Tucker, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002530

Appeal From Chester County
R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-297
Submitted June 1, 2018 – Filed July 5, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Laura Ruth Baer, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of The South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.