CourtListener 10150605•State v. Boyter
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kevin Lee Boyter, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002375
Appeal From Union County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-272
Submitted May 1, 2018 – Filed June 27, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.