Kucera v. Moss

CourtListener 10150540Scctapp04.04.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Peter Kucera, Respondent,

v.

Ashely Moss, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001145

Appeal From Greenville County
W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-141
Submitted February 9, 2018 – Filed April 4, 2018

REVERSED

Gwendolynn Wamble Barrett, of Barret Mackenzie,
LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Peter Kucera, of Greenville, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Reversed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and this court's
decision in Kucera v. Moss, Op. No. 2018-UP-140 (S.C. Ct. App. filed April 4,
2018).
REVERSED.1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.