CourtListener 10150540•Kucera v. Moss
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Peter Kucera, Respondent,
v.
Ashely Moss, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001145
Appeal From Greenville County
W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-141
Submitted February 9, 2018 – Filed April 4, 2018
REVERSED
Gwendolynn Wamble Barrett, of Barret Mackenzie,
LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Peter Kucera, of Greenville, pro se.
PER CURIAM: Reversed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and this court's
decision in Kucera v. Moss, Op. No. 2018-UP-140 (S.C. Ct. App. filed April 4,
2018).
REVERSED.1
HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.