CourtListener 10150531•In the Matter of Melvin Beam
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Melvin Beam,
Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002290
Appeal From Union County
R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-142
Submitted February 1, 2018 – Filed April 11, 2018
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and
Melvin Beam, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy,
360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.