CourtListener 10150441•The RMUE v. Bolds
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The RMUE through its General Officers Barbara B.
Clark, Warren E. Hatcher, Cassie Keeton, Daniel Green,
Powell Hampton, Amos Hatcher, Bobby Keeton, James
Moseley and Willie B. Oliver, Respondents,
v.
Herman Bolds, Richard Brown Cecil Parker, Theodore
Miller, Carl Miller, Joan S. Roper, Martha Matthews,
Thomasina G. Walker, Marilyn S. Washington, Jaree R.
Stanley, Audrey Wilder, Derrick Lucas, Willie Parker,
Jr., James Cromwell, James A. Roper, III, Elizabeth R.
Parker, Jacqueline R. Miller and Payne Church,
Appellants.
Appellate Case No. 2016-000513
Appeal From Charleston County
J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-082
Submitted January 1, 2018 – Filed February 14, 2018
AFFIRMED
Eduardo Kelvin Curry, of The Curry Law Firm LLC, of
North Charleston, for Appellants.
Darrell T. Johnson, Jr. and Mills Lane Morrison, Jr., both
of Law Offices of Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr. LLC, of
Hardeeville, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Major v. Penn Cmty. Servs., Inc., 395 S.C. 175, 180, 717 S.E.2d 70, 72
(Ct. App. 2011) ("Generally, an action to quiet title is one in equity."); Hilton Head
Plantation Prop. Owners' Ass'n v. Donald, 375 S.C. 220, 223, 651 S.E.2d 614, 616
(Ct. App. 2007) (per curiam) ("[W]hen the defendant's answer raises an issue of
paramount title to land, such as would, if established, defeat the plaintiff's action,
the issue of title is legal."); Major, 395 S.C. at 180, 717 S.E.2d at 72 ("Therefore,
in a case tried without a jury, the factual findings of a [circuit court] regarding title
will not be disturbed on appeal unless found to be without evidence [that]
reasonably supports the [circuit court]'s findings."); Lowcountry Open Land Tr. v.
State, 347 S.C. 96, 103, 552 S.E.2d 778, 782 (Ct. App. 2001) ("[T]he party
asserting a transfer of title bears the burden of proving its own good title.");
Mulherin-Howell v. Cobb, 362 S.C. 588, 601, 608 S.E.2d 587, 594 (Ct. App. 2005)
("A quitclaim deed does not guarantee the quality of title, but only conveys that
which the grantor may lawfully convey."); Von Elbrecht v. Jacobs, 286 S.C. 240,
243, 332 S.E.2d 568, 570 (Ct. App. 1985) ("[A] grantor of real property generally
can transfer no greater interest than he himself has in the property.").
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.