SCDSS v. Eller

CourtListener 10150427Scctapp05.01.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Stephanie Eller and Johnny Eller, Defendants,

Of whom Stephanie Eller is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001469

Appeal From Lexington County
Michael S. Holt, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-008
Submitted December 7, 2017 – Filed January 5, 2018

AFFIRMED

Anna Rawl Browder, of Law Office of Anna Browder,
LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Lillia Ann Gray, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Lexington, for Respondent.
Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Stephanie Eller appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Thus, we
affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Eller's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.