State v. Hodson

CourtListener 10150303Scctapp11.10.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sara Elizabeth Hodson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000644

Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-371
Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 11, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender John Harrison Strom, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, of Columbia;
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the Department of Probation,
Pardon and Parole Services, of Columbia; and Assistant
Solicitor Laura Suzanne Mayes, of Lexington, all for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.