SCDSS v. Brown

CourtListener 10150163Scctapp19.06.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Tiana Nicole Williams and Christopher Patrick Brown,
Defendants,

Of whom Christopher Patrick Brown is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000051

Appeal From Anderson County
Dale Moore Gable, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-250
Submitted June 13, 2017 – Filed June 19, 2017

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

James Victor McDade, of Doyle Tate & McDade, PA,
and Kathleen J. Hodges, of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, both of Anderson, for
Respondent.

Brittany Dreher Senerius, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys
at Law, of Anderson, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Christopher Patrick Brown appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Thus, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Brown's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.