CourtListener 10150137•SCDSS v. Tucker
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Kendra Nicole Tucker AKA Kendra Nicole Johnston
Wallace and Clinton Tucker, Defendants,
v.
Steven Borusovic and Sara Borusovic, Intervenors,
Of whom Kendra Nicole Tucker AKA Kendra Nicole
Johnston Wallace is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001224
Appeal From Anderson County
David E. Phillips, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-191
Submitted April 19, 2017 – Filed May 3, 2017
AFFIRMED
R. Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail, Jr.,
of Greenville, for Appellant.
Dottie C. Ingram, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Greenville, and Assistant Solicitor
Catherine Anderson Wyse, of Walhalla, both for
Respondent.
Larry Dale Dove, of Dove Law Group, LLC, of Rock
Hill, for Intervenors.
Brittany Dreher Senerius, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys
at Law, of Anderson, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Kendra Nicole Tucker appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
463, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Tucker's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.