State v. Henderson

CourtListener 10150092Scctapp31.05.2017

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Demetrius Derrick Henderson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001075

Appeal From Richland County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-231
Submitted January 1, 2017 – Filed May 31, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Demetrius Derrick Henderson, pro se, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
and Solicitor Daniel Edward Johnson, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.