State v. Telford

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Nathan Tyrone Telford, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-002665

Appeal From Richland County
Robert E. Hood, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-083
Submitted January 1, 2017 – Filed February 15, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.