CourtListener 10149901•State v. Daniels
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Nelapold S. Daniels, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-001806
Appeal From Lexington County
Robert E. Hood, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-049
Submitted December 1, 2016 – Filed January 25, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and
Nelapold S. Daniels, pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.