CourtListener 10149773•SCDSS v. Roberts
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Jessica J. Roberts, Richard W. Valentine, Jr., Jessie Lee
Crosby, Henry Crosby, Donna Crosby, Chris Lovelace,
and Sherri Lovelace, Defendants,
Of whom Jessica J. Roberts is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002064
Appeal From Colleton County
Deborah A. Malphrus, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-426
Submitted September 13, 2016 – Filed October 13, 2016
AFFIRMED
Marshall L. Horton and Lindsay Yoas Goodman, both of
Horton & Goodman, LLC, of Bluffton, for Appellant.
Jillian D. Ullman, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Walterboro, for Respondent.
Gregory Michael Galvin, of the Galvin Law Group, of
Bluffton, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Barber v. Barber, 402 S.C. 96, 97 n.1, 738 S.E.2d 845, 845 n.1 (Ct.
App. 2013) (addressing only one of the five issues the husband raised on appeal
because he conceded the remaining four issues); Way v. Way, 398 S.C. 1, 7 n.7,
726 S.E.2d 215, 219 n.7 (Ct. App. 2012) (finding this court need not address an
issue that was conceded on appeal).
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.