SCDSS v. Cunningham

CourtListener 10149647Scctapp07.06.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Linda McKinley, Conan Pannell, John Cunningham, and
Paul D. Stradling, Defendants,

Of whom John Cunningham is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2015-002523

Appeal From Anderson County
David E. Phillips, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-284
Submitted May 25, 2016 – Filed June 7, 2016

AFFIRMED

R. Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail, Jr.,
of Greenville, for Appellant.

Kaye Davis, of the South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Brittany Dreher Senerius, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys
at Law, of Anderson, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: John Cunningham appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Cunningham's
counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.