CourtListener 10149646•SCDSS v. McKinley
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Linda McKinley, Conan Pannell, John Cunningham, and
Paul D. Stradling, Defendants,
Of whom Linda McKinley is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002386
Appeal From Anderson County
David E. Phillips, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-283
Submitted May 25, 2016 – Filed June 7, 2016
AFFIRMED
William E. Phillips, of Anderson, for Appellant.
Kaye Davis, of the South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Brittany Dreher Senerius, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys
at Law, of Anderson, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Linda McKinley appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McKinley's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.