CourtListener 10149644•Bethune v. Waffle House, Inc.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Hubert Bethune, Respondent,
v.
Waffle House, Inc., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002058
Appeal From Anderson County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-276
Submitted March 1, 2016 – Filed June 8, 2016
AFFIRMED
Andrew F. Lindemann, of Davidson & Lindemann, PA,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Rodney M. Brown, of Rodney M. Brown, P.A., of
Fountain Inn, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 22-3-10(2) (2007) ("Magistrates have concurrent
civil jurisdiction in . . . actions for damages for injury to rights pertaining to the
person or personal or real property, if the damages claimed do not exceed seven
thousand five hundred dollars . . . ."); Lake v. Reeder Constr. Co., 330 S.C. 242,
248, 498 S.E.2d 650, 653 (Ct. App. 1998) ("Lack of subject matter jurisdiction can
be raised at any time, can be raised for the first time on appeal, and can be raised
sua sponte by the court."); Rule 41(a)(2), SCRCP ("[A]n action shall not be
dismissed at the plaintiff's instance save upon order of the court and upon such
terms and conditions as the court deems proper.").
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, A.C.J., and SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.