CourtListener 10149621•State v. Robinson
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Otis Robinson, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-002392
Appeal From Charleston County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-273
Submitted May 1, 2016 – Filed June 8, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and
Otis Robinson, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.