CourtListener 10149501•SCDSS v. Gill
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Tyeisha Miller and Channing Gill, Sr., Defendants,
Of Whom Channing Gill, Sr., is the Appellant.
In the interests of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2015-001096
Appeal From Sumter County
Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-179
Submitted March 10, 2016 – Filed April 11, 2016
AFFIRMED
Montford Shuler Caughman, of Caughman Law, LLC, of
Lexington, for Appellant.
Lauren Boswell Stevens, of Dalzell, for Respondent.
Edgar R. Donnald, Jr., of Sumter, and Brenda L. Gorski,
of the South Carolina Guardian Ad Litem Program, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Channing Gill, Sr., appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (Supp. 2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Gill's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT and THOMAS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.