State v. Chiles

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Wince Chiles, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002533

Appeal From Greenville County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-108
Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 2, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia; and David Wince Chiles, Jr., pro se, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Interim Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins,
III, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.