CourtListener 10149474•State v. Copeland
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Obryan Exxidice Copeland, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000703
Appeal From Laurens County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-096
Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 2, 2016
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia;
and Obryan Exxidice Copeland, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Interim
Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John
Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia; and Solicitor David
Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.