State v. Griffin

CourtListener 10149347Scctapp20.01.2016

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jennifer Lorene Hatfield Griffin, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002042

Appeal From Florence County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-027
Submitted December 1, 2015 – Filed January 20, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.