SCDSS v. Artison

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Taneisha Artison and Eric Anderson, Defendants,

Of whom Taneisha Artison is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2015-000642

Appeal From Spartanburg County
James F. Fraley, Jr., Family Court Judge,

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-521
Submitted October 15, 2015 – Filed November 13, 2015

AFFIRMED

Richard Whitney Allen, of The Law Offices of Richard
W. Allen, L.L.C., of Laurens, for Appellant.

Robert C. Rhoden, III, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
Michael Todd Thigpen, Attorney at Law, of Spartanburg,
for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Taneisha Artison appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her four minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. §
63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Taneisha
Artison's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.