State v. Mack

CourtListener 10149219Scctapp02.09.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brian Curtis Mack, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001726

Appeal From Lexington County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-449
Submitted May 1, 2015 – Filed September 2, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Mary Williams Leddon, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: State v. McKinney, 278 S.C. 107, 108, 292 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1982)
(holding the failure to object to the involuntary or unknowing nature of a guilty
plea precludes consideration of the issue on appeal).

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.