CourtListener 10149168•Zeng v. Coosaw Partners
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Chang Hua Zeng, Appellant,
v.
Coosaw Partners, LLC and Terry Kinder, Respondents.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001353
Appeal From Dorchester County
Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-410
Submitted June 1, 2015 – Filed August 12, 2015
AFFIRMED
Chang Hua Zeng, of North Charleston, pro se.
Steven L. Smith, of Smith Closser, of Charleston, for
Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465, 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2011)
("At a minimum, issue preservation requires that an issue be raised to and ruled
upon by the trial [court].").
AFFIRMED.1
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.