CourtListener 10149144•SCDSS v. Linder
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Stefanie Linder, Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002551
Appeal from Colleton County
Gerald C. Smoak, Jr., Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-450
Submitted August 5, 2015 – Filed August 31, 2015
AFFIRMED
Marshall L. Horton, of Horton Law Firm, LLC, of
Bluffton, for Appellant.
Jillian D. Ullman, of the Department of Social Services,
of Walterboro, for Respondent.
Gregory Michael Galvin, of Galvin Law Group, of
Bluffton, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Stefanie Linder appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. Upon a thorough review of the record and
the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Linder's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.