CourtListener 10148997•SCDSS v. Tucker
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Jamielynn Adale Beneduce Tucker and Marc Robert
LeDuc, Sr., Defendants,
Of whom Jamielynn Adale Beneduce Tucker is the
Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002299
Appeal From Horry County
Ronald R. Norton, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-255
Submitted April 27, 2015 – Filed May 8, 2015
AFFIRMED
Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.
Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson Jarrett & Kellahan,
PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.
Ian Andrew Taylor, of Taylor Law Office, of Pawleys
Island, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Jamielynn Adale Beneduce Tucker appeals the family court's
final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code
Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Tucker's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.