CourtListener 10148989•State v. Glover
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Nicholas Blake Glover, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000103
Appeal From Bamberg County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-251
Submitted March 1, 2015 – Filed May 13, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.